You don’t have a community engagement problem. You have a participation design problem.

Many nonprofit teams I know are exhausted from trying to keep up with the engagement machine.

Another newsletter. Another webinar. Another social media channel. Another platform. Another “quick” campaign that quietly becomes twelve more tasks on someone’s already-too-full plate.

And yet, even with all that communication, many organizations are still asking the same question: Why aren’t people engaging?

The answer is likely not that your audience does not care. It's more likely that your organization has designed too many ways for people to consume and not enough meaningful ways for them to participate.

This is the pattern I see over and over again in nonprofit spaces, membership communities, and mission-driven networks: We have confused communication with community. We assume that if we publish enough content, launch enough campaigns, or create enough digital spaces, connection will naturally follow.

But a platform is only a venue. Content is only a starting point. And attention alone does not create belonging.

Also read: Keep your website traffic up in an AI-first search world

That is one of the biggest lessons I have learned through building The Nonprofit Hive. The strongest moments in that community have not come from the most polished content or the newest tool. They have come from helping nonprofit professionals meet one another in simple, human ways — often through one-to-one conversations that allow people to go deeper than they ever could in a comment thread or webinar chat.

According to NTEN’s 2024 Digital Skills and Equity Report, nonprofit professionals continue to report capacity strain, burnout, and increasing pressure to “do more digitally” with limited staff and resources. At the same time, many organizations are struggling with declining engagement rates across email and social platforms despite producing more content than ever before.

---

Why aren’t people engaging? The answer is likely not that your audience does not care. It's more likely that your organization has designed too many ways for people to consume and not enough meaningful ways for them to participate.

---

That disconnect matters. Because if all we do is publish, post, and promote, we are not building community. We are managing an audience.

And audiences behave very differently than communities do.

Audience vs. community

Let's start with some core statements that I have found to be true about audience vs. community from years of marketing and community building in this sector.

1. An audience listens. A community participates.
2. An audience consumes. A community contributes.
3. An audience receives your message. A community helps shape what happens next.

This distinction matters because many nonprofits are not only trying to build larger audiences. They are trying to build deeper engagement that leads to an action.

They want:

• More volunteer retention.
• Stronger donor loyalty.
• More peer connection.
• More advocacy momentum.
• More member participation.
• More community-led leadership.
• More trust.

And none of those outcomes are created through broadcasting alone.

They are created when people are invited to move closer to the work and closer to one another. In The Nonprofit Hive, that has looked like weekly Hive Chats, thoughtful prompts, member spotlights, and a steady belief that community starts at the scale of two people. One person meeting one other person. One conversation. One moment of recognition.

This is where participation design becomes important. Participation design is the intentional process of creating clear, low-pressure ways for people to move from receiving information to taking part.

Not everyone wants to become a community leader overnight. Most people simply want to know:

• Is there a place for me here?
• Does my presence matter?
• Is there an easy way to contribute?
• Will anyone notice if I do?

Strong communities answer those questions consistently.

And importantly, participation design is not about making people do more. It is about making participation feel easier, clearer, and more human.

We keep designing for broadcast instead of belonging

Most nonprofit systems and technologies we use today were built for communication efficiency, not relational depth.

Email platforms were designed to send updates. Social media was designed for visibility. CRMs were designed to track contacts. Webinars were designed for presentations.

None of those tools are inherently community-building on their own.

People need a reason to interact, contribute, and return. And right now, many nonprofit engagement systems unintentionally create passive behavior because they are optimized for distribution instead of participation.

---

Participation design is the intentional process of creating clear, low-pressure ways for people to move from receiving information to taking part.

---

This is especially important because research from Community Roundtable’s State of Community Management Report consistently shows that communities with intentional participation structures experience stronger retention, higher contribution rates, and greater long-term engagement than communities built primarily around content delivery alone.

In other words: People stay where they feel useful, connected, and seen. Not just informed.

What participation design actually looks like

Participation design sounds strategic — and it is — but in practice, it is often surprisingly small.

A strong participation system gives people:

1. A clear reason to show up.
2. A simple way to take part.
3. A feeling that their presence matters.
4. A reason to return.
5. A pathway to contribute more deeply over time.

That sounds too simple sometimes, but in my experience, THIS is the kind of space where depth of community builds from. Not every nonprofit needs a massive online community strategy or a complicated engagement funnel.

Sometimes the most meaningful shifts happen through tiny relational moments that are intentionally repeated. A thoughtful welcome email. A reply prompt. A peer introduction. A recurring question. A visible feedback loop.

Community is often built through accumulation, not spectacle.

The five layers of a simple participation system

Like many working in nonprofit marketing, I did not set out to create a “participation design system.” I was simply trying to solve a problem I kept seeing over and over again.

Organizations were working incredibly hard to engage people. Teams I worked with (and me!) were sending newsletters, hosting webinars, launching online groups, posting constantly on social media, and investing in new platforms. Yet somehow many of us still felt wildly disconnected from the communities we were trying to serve and grow.

---

Sometimes the most meaningful shifts happen through tiny relational moments that are intentionally repeated. A thoughtful welcome email. A reply prompt. A peer introduction. A recurring question. A visible feedback loop.

---

At the same time, I noticed something important: the moments that created the strongest sense of connection were rarely the most polished campaigns or the most sophisticated tools. They were usually small, intentional interactions. A thoughtful welcome message. A question that invited someone to share their experience. A simple introduction between two people with something in common. A follow-up that made someone feel remembered instead of processed.

Over time, I started paying closer attention to those moments and asking a different question:

What if stronger community engagement is not primarily about creating more content or adding more technology, but about designing better opportunities for participation?

1. Invitation

Most nonprofit engagement starts with an announcement; but stronger community engagement starts with an invitation.

There is a difference between: "Register for our upcoming session.”

And: “We’re bringing together nonprofit professionals who are navigating this same challenge. Come share what you’re seeing and learn from others in the room.”

One communicates information. The other communicates belonging. An invitation tells people: There is a place for you here. Simple invitation shifts might include:

• Asking donors why they chose to give.
• Inviting volunteers to bring one question to orientation.
• Asking webinar attendees to submit a challenge beforehand.
• Encouraging members to introduce themselves to one other person.

These are small changes, but they fundamentally shift people from passive recipients into active participants. And importantly, invitations lower the emotional barrier to engagement.

People are far more likely to participate when they understand what kind of participation is welcome.

2. Entry points

Not everyone wants to immediately speak on a panel, lead a discussion, or become an ambassador.

Some people are active contributors. Some people are quiet supporters. Both matter.

Also read: Seven ways to build an equitable website

Quiet does not mean disengaged. Sometimes quiet means people are looking for the right doorway in. Strong participation systems create low-pressure entry points that allow people to engage at different comfort levels.

Examples include:

• A one-question poll.
• A “reply to this email” prompt.
• A short intake form asking what someone hopes to learn.
• A “share one resource” thread.
• A simple “what brought you here?” question.
• A post-event reflection prompt.

The goal is not performative engagement. The goal is reducing friction. Because participation grows when people feel psychologically safe enough to contribute.

3. Connection

This is the layer many nonprofit systems unintentionally skip.

We create content for people. We create campaigns for people. We create events for people. But we do not always create enough opportunities for people to connect with each other. And peer connection is often where belonging actually begins.

Research from the Harvard Human Flourishing Program and multiple studies on social trust continue to reinforce the same truth: people are significantly more likely to remain engaged in communities where they form interpersonal relationships. Not just relationships with the organization. Relationships with each other.

This does not require building a giant networking infrastructure overnight. It can look like:

• Pairing two new volunteers together.
• Matching first-time attendees with returning participants.
• Creating breakout conversations after webinars.
• Inviting members to connect around shared challenges.
• Reflecting community stories back into future communications.

The goal is simple: Help people feel less anonymous. Because anonymity rarely creates long-term engagement. Recognition does.

4. Rhythm

One-off campaigns create attention. Repeatable rhythms create trust.

Community is built through repeated moments people can understand and return to. This is one of the biggest lessons I continue to see across healthy communities and networks: People return to what feels familiar, useful, and human.

---

People rarely move from passive audience member to active contributor in one leap. Participation has to be scaffolded.

---

Rhythm creates emotional predictability. And emotional predictability creates safety.

Simple rhythms might include:

• A monthly member question.
• A recurring peer conversation.
• A quarterly pulse check.
• A welcome email that always invites a reply.
• A monthly community spotlight.
• A “what we heard from you” update.
• A recurring reflection prompt after events.

These rhythms do not need to be complicated. In fact, simpler is often better. The goal is consistency, not perfection.

5. Contribution

People rarely move from passive audience member to active contributor in one leap. Participation has to be scaffolded.

One of the most helpful ways to think about this is through a ladder of contribution.

Most organizations unintentionally design only for the top layer. But healthy communities grow because they support movement between layers gradually.

People contribute more deeply when participation feels meaningful, possible, and recognized. Not pressured.

Your existing digital tools can become participation infrastructure

One of the most important things nonprofit teams need to hear is this: You probably do not need another platform.

You may simply need to redesign how people move through the systems you already have.

Here is what that can look like in practice:

What to measure instead of only clicks

Open rates matter. Clicks matter. Registrations matter. But they do not tell the whole story. Because attention is not the same thing as connection.

Participation design asks different questions:

• Are people replying?
• Are people returning?
• Are people introducing others?
• Are people sharing stories?
• Are people connecting with each other?
• Are new voices emerging?
• Are quieter supporters finding ways to participate?
• Are people moving from attention to contribution over time?

If we only measure attention, we miss the moment someone starts to feel like they belong. And belonging is often the thing that sustains engagement long after novelty fades.

A simple place to start

If this feels overwhelming, start smaller than you think you need to.

Choose one audience journey:

• New donors
• Volunteers
• Event attendees
• Members
• Advocates
• Alumni
• Program participants

Then ask:

Where does participation currently stop?

Maybe someone donates and only receives a receipt.
Maybe someone attends a webinar and never hears from anyone again.
Maybe someone joins a platform and is left to navigate it alone.

Find the dead end.

Then add one participation point.

• One question
• One invitation
• One introduction
• One recurring ritual

That is enough to begin. Because community is rarely built through dramatic gestures. It is built through repeated moments of recognition, contribution, and connection over time.

Make connection easier to repeat

Nonprofit teams do not need more pressure to create more content, manage more platforms, or chase every new engagement trend. They need simpler systems that make connection easier to repeat.

Also read: De-silo your nonprofit workplace

Community is not built because people are told to care. It is built when people are invited to participate, see themselves reflected, and feel that their contribution matters.

And often, the first step is beautifully small:

Ask a better question.
Make one introduction.
Create one repeatable ritual.
Show people there is a real place for them here.

Tasha Van Vlack

she/her

CEO and Founder, The Nonprofit Hive

Tasha Van Vlack is the Co-Director of The Nonprofit Hive and Founder of Community Hives. Through The Nonprofit Hive, she has helped grow a global community of nonprofit professionals built around meaningful 1:1 connection, peer support, and sector-wide learning. Her work focuses on community building in social impact, especially how nonprofits can move beyond content-heavy engagement and create spaces where people feel known, supported, and less alone. She is now building Community Hives, a platform that helps mission-driven organizations bring simple, repeatable, human-centered connection into their own communities.